Custom Query (1030 matches)
Results (415 - 417 of 1030)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #514 | fixed | Version string for IDE appears not to include the architecture | ||
| Description |
In the console, the ccl image starts with a greeting: Welcome to Clozure Common Lisp Version 1.3-dev-r12149M-trunk (DarwinX8664)! The nearest equivalent string in the IDE appears to be in the about box: Clozure Common Lisp version 1.3 (12149M-trunk) This does not appear to contain the architecture (PPC, x86, 32 or 64 bits), making it harder to remember to include this information when submitting bug reports. |
|||
| #678 | worksforme | Using a non-existant package corrupts the current package, disinterns builtins (CCL/Win32) | ||
| Description |
Hi, When the a package is present, say, HUNCHENTOOT, the following works (defpackage :foo
(in-package :foo) .. However, as start to use more packages during the course of hacking, I sometimes :USE non-existent package or misspell its name. (defpackage :foo
(in-package :foo) .. On Linux, I get the correct behaviour: The name "FROB" does not designate any package.
But on Win32, things get unwieldy: I first get the error, but if I try to correct it by fixing the spelling or loading an ASDF system, all forms refuse to evaluate. For example, after fixing the typo, I get this: Undefined function :USE called with arguments (:CL
Even evaluating () returns ==> COMMON-LISP:NIL The only way I know how to repair things without restarting CCL is to do this: FOO> (cl-user::in-package :cl-user) #<Package "COMMON-LISP-USER"> CL-USER> (in-package :foo) #<Package "FOO"> Attached is a stack trace. CL-USER> (lisp-implementation-version) "Version 1.4 (WindowsX8632)" |
|||
| #337 | fixed | Use a hidden initfile on *nix systems | ||
| Description |
The attached patch makes CCL look for ~/.ccl-init.lisp before ~/ccl-init.lisp . This adheres to the Unix tradition of making .rc files hidden. |
|||
