Custom Query (1030 matches)
Results (193 - 195 of 1030)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #924 | fixed | Add monotonic clock support | ||
| Description |
Dan Weinreb 2008-12-05 10:58:05 EST It would be nice to have a way to get "monotonic" time from Linux, which is obtained by clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &ts); Priority: If you have to wash your dog, do that first. NB: This was ITA bug 51985. |
|||
| #926 | fixed | Some users have difficulty understanding the error that occurs when declarations are encountered in contexts where they aren't allowed | ||
| Description |
Dan Weinreb 2009-01-05 13:49:46 EST (defun foo (a) (declare (fixnum a)) (+ a a)) works fine. (defmacro bad () '(declare (fixnum a))) (defun foo (a) (bad) (+ a a)) gets a compile-time error, because macros are not allowed to expand into declarations. However, the text of the error message is: DECLARE not expected in (DECLARE (FIXNUM A)). That's pretty unclear. [NB: was ITA bug 52936] |
|||
| #927 | fixed | If a symbol-macrolet defines the same symbol twice, the compiler should complain | ||
| Description |
Dan Weinreb 2009-01-09 10:59:52 EST We had trouble in a place where a macro of ours expanded into a symbol-macrolet with several clauses, two of which defined the very same symbol. See our Buzilla http://svn.internal.itasoftware.com/trac/changeset/238504 I don't actually see anywhere in the HyperSpec that says this is illegal, although it also does not say what it would do (which symbol "wins"?). SBCL flags it as an error. For the time being, Fare has fixed that macro to check for that error manually. [NB: ITA Bug 53168] |
|||
