Custom Query (1030 matches)
Results (691 - 693 of 1030)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #674 | fixed | (/ (complex 1d160 1)) overflows | ||
| Description |
(/ (complex 1d160 1)) overflows Answer should be #C(1.0d-160 -9.99988867182683d-321) |
|||
| #678 | worksforme | Using a non-existant package corrupts the current package, disinterns builtins (CCL/Win32) | ||
| Description |
Hi, When the a package is present, say, HUNCHENTOOT, the following works (defpackage :foo
(in-package :foo) .. However, as start to use more packages during the course of hacking, I sometimes :USE non-existent package or misspell its name. (defpackage :foo
(in-package :foo) .. On Linux, I get the correct behaviour: The name "FROB" does not designate any package.
But on Win32, things get unwieldy: I first get the error, but if I try to correct it by fixing the spelling or loading an ASDF system, all forms refuse to evaluate. For example, after fixing the typo, I get this: Undefined function :USE called with arguments (:CL
Even evaluating () returns ==> COMMON-LISP:NIL The only way I know how to repair things without restarting CCL is to do this: FOO> (cl-user::in-package :cl-user) #<Package "COMMON-LISP-USER"> CL-USER> (in-package :foo) #<Package "FOO"> Attached is a stack trace. CL-USER> (lisp-implementation-version) "Version 1.4 (WindowsX8632)" |
|||
| #680 | fixed | ccl:send-to says it can take a string arg, but it really can't. | ||
| Description |
Welcome to Clozure Common Lisp Version 1.6-dev-r13678M (DarwinX8664)! ? (defparameter *s* (make-socket :type :datagram)) *S* ? (send-to *s* "hey" 3 :remote-host "127.0.0.1" :remote-port 12345) > Error: value "hey" is not of the expected type (OR (ARRAY CHARACTER) > (ARRAY (UNSIGNED-BYTE 8)) > (ARRAY (SIGNED-BYTE 8))). > While executing: VERIFY-SOCKET-BUFFER, in process listener(1). > Type :POP to abort, :R for a list of available restarts. > Type :? for other options. 1 > verify-socket-buffer is actually checking for an 8-bit subtag, and with this new-fangled unicode thing, that doesn't include strings. My first inclination is to say that i/o on datagram sockets is done in octects. This requires the user to use encode-string-to-octects/decode-string-from-octets explicitly. It might also be work to pay attention to the socket object's external format and encode the string on the user's behalf, but if Gilgamesh wants to send a cuneiform string "foo", then the actual buffer length in octets isn't going to be 3. |
|||
